"Hard Times" by Charles Dickens
"Hard Times"
By
Charles Dickens
(Thinking Activity)
Introduction :-
"Hard Times" novel written by Charles Dickens. This novel published in the year 1854. In this novel Charles Dickens used the humour and satire with the help of softness. Charles Dickens one of the great writer in his time. In this thinking activity task I will define one question in the detail.
Charles Dickens (1812-1870) was a renowned English writer of the Victorian era. He is celebrated for his vivid characters, intricate plots, and social commentary in his novels.
 |
| Charles Dickens (1812-1870) |
works List :-
1. "Oliver Twist,"
2. "David Copperfield,"
3. "Great Expectations,"
4. "A Tale of Two Cities."
Dickens used his writing to highlight the harsh social conditions and inequalities of his time, advocating for reform. His contributions to literature have left a lasting impact, and his novels continue to be beloved classics. Now let's discuss about the question.
Question :-
Discuss the views of F.R Leavis and J.B Priestley on 'Hard Times'. With whom do you agree?why?
Answer :-
F.R. Leavis and J.B. Priestley were two prominent literary critics with differing views on Charles Dickens' "Hard Times." First let's see in a coman way...
F.R. Leavis, a notable literary critic, had a critical perspective on "Hard Times." He viewed it as one of Dickens' lesser works, criticizing its lack of subtlety and depth compared to his other novels. Leavis believed that Dickens' characters in "Hard Times" were more like mouthpieces for his social commentary than fully developed individuals. He argued that the novel's overt satire and didacticism compromised its artistic value.
On the other hand, J.B. Priestley, another respected critic, held a more positive view of "Hard Times." He appreciated the novel's social critique, particularly its condemnation of the dehumanizing effects of industrialization and utilitarianism. Priestley believed that the characters, while symbolic, effectively conveyed Dickens' message about the importance of compassion and imagination in a mechanized world.
Whether you agree with Leavis or Priestley depends on your perspective. Leavis' critique highlights valid concerns about the novel's artistry and character development. However, Priestley's focus on the novel's social message and its relevance to the time it was written also has merit. Ultimately, your agreement may depend on whether you prioritize literary craftsmanship or the novel's thematic significance. Both views contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of "Hard Times."
Let's dig deeper about both perspective....
Certainly! Let's delve deeper into the views of F.R. Leavis and J.B. Priestley on Charles Dickens' "Hard Times."
1. F.R. Leavis's Perspective:
➤ Leavis, known for his critical approach known as "The Great Tradition," held high standards for literature. He believed that great novels should explore complex psychological and moral issues through well-developed characters and intricate narrative techniques.
➤ In the case of "Hard Times," Leavis found fault with Dickens' overt didacticism. He argued that the characters were more like caricatures, representing Dickens' social and moral messages rather than exhibiting depth and psychological complexity.
➤ Leavis also criticized the novel's lack of subtlety, suggesting that Dickens' critique of utilitarianism and industrialization was heavy-handed, leaving little room for readers to interpret or engage with the themes independently.
➤ Leavis considered "Hard Times" as an example of Dickens' decline as a novelist and believed it did not measure up to the standards set by Dickens' earlier works like "Great Expectations" or "Bleak House."
2. J.B. Priestley's Perspective:
➢ Priestley, another respected literary figure, saw value in "Hard Times" beyond its artistic merits. He appreciated the novel for its social commentary, which he found relevant to the contemporary issues of his time.
➢ Priestley admired Dickens' critique of the dehumanizing impact of industrialization and utilitarian philosophy. He believed that the characters, though symbolic, effectively conveyed Dickens' central message about the importance of compassion, empathy, and imagination in a mechanized society.
➢ Priestley argued that "Hard Times" served as a powerful indictment of the social injustices and moral shortcomings of the Victorian era, which continued to resonate with readers in the modern age.
In essence, the debate between Leavis and Priestley reflects a broader discussion in literary criticism regarding the balance between artistry and thematic relevance in literature. Leavis emphasized the importance of literary craftsmanship and character development, while Priestley highlighted the novel's social and moral significance.
I agree with....
I agree with the J.B. Priestley's views on the "Hard Times". Because he saw the valuable things in "Hard Times". He gave his own point of view on "Hard Times". He gave his own argue on the dehumanising impact of industrialization and utilitarian philosophy. He talks about every possible side of critique on "Hard Times" and he also talks about "Hard Times" in contemporary time. He clarifies the positive side of Dickens's "Hard Times". He covered all the possible side of information and knowledge about "Hard Times".
Conclusion :-
"Hard Times" is a most famous novel by Charles Dickens. Charles Dickens wrote this novel by the help of humour with satire. F.R. Leavis and P.B. Priestley make a critique on "Hard Times".
Resources :-
Comments
Post a Comment